Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than Galaxy Note7, with an 87.5 score against 79.5. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is incredibly newer and just a little bit lighter, but a little bit thicker than Galaxy Note7. Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with faster video frame rates and a better 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.