Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's global score of 79.5. Google Pixel 5's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but it is lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has just a bit better display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount in each screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 5 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with faster video frame rates and a camera with a higher 12.2 MP resolution.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.