Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-08-02 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy Note7, with an 81 score against 79.5. The LG G7 ThinQ is a just a bit lighter phone than the Galaxy Note7, but they are equally thin. LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has 4 more cpu cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a little bigger display, a quite higher display pixel density and a slightly higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG G7 ThinQ captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a bit superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.