Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note7's 79.5 score. Even though the LG K92 is newer than the Galaxy Note7, it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG K92 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note7 features a little bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels count in each inch in the display. LG K92 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
The LG K92 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG K92 features a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.