Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than the LG Q70, with a overall score of 79.5 against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy Note7's construction is a bit thinner and lighter than the LG Q70, although it was released many years before. Galaxy Note7 has a little bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The LG Q70 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG Q70 also has more cpu cores (although they are slower). LG Q70 shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
The LG Q70 counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Q70 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 14% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.