Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's score of 79.5. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but both of them are equally thin. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a more powerful processor than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more cores and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a back camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.