Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's overall score of 79.5. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's construction is newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. Galaxy Note7 has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen. The Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos, it also counts with a way better video quality, a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and videos and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.