Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note7's general score of 79.5. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is notably newer than Galaxy Note7's, but it's just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little lower 1256 x 2760 resolution and a just a little lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy Note7 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has improved battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.