Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy Note7, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 79.5. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Pro is newer than the Galaxy Note7, it's a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The Galaxy Note7 has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way bigger camera sensor, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 29% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.