Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, having a overall score of 81.5 against 79.5. The Motorola Moto G 5G body is a lot newer, but incredibly thicker and extremely heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a higher number of faster cores.
The Moto G 5G features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Moto G 5G takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.