Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. Although the Galaxy Note7 is way older than the Motorola Moto G Power, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Moto G Power counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G Power also has more processing cores.
Galaxy Note7 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch. Moto G Power captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Moto G Power also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Moto G Power features a little bit more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Power also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.