Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Galaxy Note7, with an 86.2 score against 79.5. Motorola Moto G200 5G is a much newer cellphone than Galaxy Note7, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Moto G200 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43% more battery capacity. Moto G200 5G has a greater camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.