Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power, having a score of 79.5 against 76. Even though Galaxy Note7 is much older than the Moto G8 Power, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. Galaxy Note7 has a little more vivid display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen density.
Moto G8 Power has a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G8 Power also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G8 Power counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G8 Power also has more processing cores.
The Moto G8 Power captures a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a way better 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto G8 Power counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.