Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a global score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the Moto G9 Power's global score of 78.6. Samsung Galaxy Note7's design is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Power, even though it was released 4 years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a much better looking screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way greater display pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Moto G9 Power features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G9 Power counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto G9 Power also has 4 more CPU cores (but slower).
The Moto G9 Power counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. Moto G9 Power shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G9 Power also counts with faster video frame rate and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.