Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-08-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is a better phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, we must highlight that it's also a a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier phone. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit better screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per display inch.
Moto Z Force features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note7. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Motorola Moto Z Force's battery life is just as good as the Galaxy Note7 one. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.