Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-08-02 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 79.5 against 77.4. Even being the best phone in this review, we must tell that it is also older, heavier and a lot thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has more CPU cores. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note7 and the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition feature quite similar cameras, and although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a smaller diafragm aperture and a tinier back camera sensor, they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy Note7 counts with better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.