Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-08-02 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. Although it's the best we compare here, we must highlight that it is also older, somewhat heavier and way thicker. The Moto Z2 Play features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto Z2 Play also has a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a higher pixel quantity in each inch in the display, a little bit larger display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy Note7 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.7 aperture, a 12 MP resolution back facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note7 has just a little better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.