Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-08-02 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. Samsung Galaxy Note7's design is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola One Action, although it was released many years before. The Motorola One Action counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Action also has a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch. Motorola One Action counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Action features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Galaxy Note7 one. Motorola One Action's camera is just as good as the Galaxy Note7 one, and although the Motorola One Action has a smaller aperture, they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.