Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-08-02 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's overall score of 79.5. The Motorola One Vision design is newer, but just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Motorola One Vision captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a much higher 48 MP resolution camera.
The Motorola One Vision features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Vision's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy Note7.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.