Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than Galaxy Note7, getting an 87 score against 79.5. The Motorola razr (2020) is a heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note7, but both of them are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has improved battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.