Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note7 is an extremely older and just a little thicker device than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but Samsung made it a little bit lighter anyway. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit worse screen density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 15% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.