Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note7's score of 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G design is noticeably newer than Galaxy Note7's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy Note7 has a bit better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A22 5G has much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.