Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, having a 90.7 score against 79.5. The Galaxy A52 design is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's, although it is heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note7 has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy A52 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 64 MP resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.