Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is much better than the Galaxy Note7, having a score of 87.5 against 79.5. The Galaxy A71 body is extremely newer and just a bit thinner than Galaxy Note7's, although it is a little heavier. The Galaxy A71 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note7 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixels density. Galaxy A71 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has improved battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.