Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, having a global score of 88.1 against 79.5. The Galaxy F62 body is much newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note7. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.