Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-08-02 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note7's overall score of 79.5. Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and way lighter device than the Galaxy Note7. The Galaxy Note7 features a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory.
Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little lower screen density and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Galaxy Note7 features a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy S25 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Galaxy S25 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.