Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-08-02 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Galaxy Note7's 79.5 overall score. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and much thinner device than Galaxy Note7. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy Note7 has a very superior processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way more mega-pixels back camera, a way better video definition and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.