Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Galaxy Note7, getting a score of 80.1 against 79.5. Even though the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than Galaxy Note7, it is noticeably thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a bit higher pixels number per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.