Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, getting an 81 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note7's, but it's heavier and extremely thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Galaxy Note7 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a way tinier sensor capturing way worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with slightly more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.