Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, having a 92.3 score against 79.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note7, it's a bit thinner and newer. The Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel count per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6% more battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs and a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.