Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's global score of 79.5. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note7, it's somewhat thinner and newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy Note7 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a better display pixel density. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.