Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-08-02 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has an overall score of 86.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note7's 79.5 overall score. Despite being the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's body is a little thicker and heavier than the Galaxy Note7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro and Galaxy Note7 both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.