Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, having an 81.1 score against 79.5. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, it's thicker and heavier. The Galaxy Note7 features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.