Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, with a global score of 83 against 79.5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's body is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy Note7's, although it's thicker and heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has 4 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.