Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-15 | -- |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.88 ounces | -- |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note8 has an overall score of 83, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 82.2 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14, providing you a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy Note8 counts with a much greater processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy Note8 has a lot better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher number of pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better video frame rate and a way more MP camera in the back. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.