Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a general score of 83, which is just a bit better than LG K62's 78.2 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note8 is a better device than the LG K62, it must be told that it's also a noticeably older, just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier device. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while LG K62 has Android 10.
Galaxy Note8 counts with a brighter display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The LG K62 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note8, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note8 has a little bit better processing power than LG K62, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note8 also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG K62 has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. LG K62 has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K62 also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.