Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note8, having a overall score of 85.4 against 83. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but LG K92 has older 10 version and Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG K92 design is extremely newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy Note8's, but it's also just a little bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a bit better CPU than LG K92. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy Note8 has a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher screen density.
LG K92 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos.
LG K92 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG K92 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG K92 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.