Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2017-09-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a score of 83, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. Although it's the best in our current comparison, we must note that it is also a thicker and somewhat heavier device. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better display than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note8. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
The LG V35 ThinQ's battery duration is very similar to Galaxy Note8's battery lifetime. LG V35 ThinQ captures a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and a lot more MP camera.
Although Galaxy Note8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.