Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note8, getting an 87.6 score against 83. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version while Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG V60 ThinQ's design is notably newer than the Galaxy Note8's, although it is just a little bit thicker and heavier.
Galaxy Note8 features a bit more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note8, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V60 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.