Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note8, having a general score of 86.2 against 83. These phones have Android OS, but Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Moto G200 5G construction is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note8's, but it is just a little thicker and a little heavier.
The Galaxy Note8 has a little more vivid screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. Moto G200 5G features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Moto G200 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a superior battery life than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.