Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is a bit better than Moto G9 Power, getting a global score of 83 against 78.6. The Galaxy Note8 is an older phone than the Moto G9 Power, but it's somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note8 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10, so it provides you lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy Note8 has a little bit better performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note8 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a way greater pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Moto G9 Power takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G9 Power also counts with better video frame rate and a lot better resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G9 Power features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Power counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.