Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a global score of 83 against 79.8. Even though the Galaxy Note8 is much older than the Motorola One Hyper, it's body is a little thinner and a bit lighter. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, providing you some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has just a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater screen density. Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note8 also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola One Hyper has better battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola One Hyper takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Note8 costs more money than Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.