Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a general score of 83, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2's global score of 79.7. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, offering a lot of extra features and better performance. Although Samsung Galaxy Note8 is better than the OPPO Find X2, it must be noted that it is also a way older, a little bit heavier and just a little thicker device.
OPPO Find X2 has a little faster processor than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a bit larger display.
OPPO Find X2 takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, higher video frame rate and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
OPPO Find X2 has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.