Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a general score of 83 against 77.7. Although it's the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also incredibly older, heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a just a little worse display pixels density and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo features improved battery duration than Galaxy Note8, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.