Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy Note8, having an 83.1 score against 83. OPPO Find X2 Pro is a extremely newer phone than Galaxy Note8, although it is just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3168px resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much more MP camera in the back, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.