Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting an 83 score against 76. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11, so it provides you a lot of extra features. Even being the best in this review, Galaxy Note8 is an extremely older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier phone than the OPPO Find X3 Neo.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with better video frame rate and a lot better 50 MP resolution camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy Note8 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.