Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 has a global score of 83, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's overall score of 79.4. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14, so it offers some nice extra features. Galaxy Note8's construction is a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it is a bit thicker and was released 7 years before.
Galaxy Note8 has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy Note8 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a little bit more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.