Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the Galaxy Note8's 83 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Galaxy Note8. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Note8 features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy Note8 has a little faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has better battery duration than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A52 5G features a greater camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.