Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note8, getting a general score of 88.1 against 83. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy F62 construction is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note8's, although it's a bit thicker and heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Galaxy Note8 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy Note8 also has a greater number of cores (although slower).
The Galaxy F62 features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 112% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.