Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2017-09-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note8's overall score of 83. The Galaxy S10e body is newer, much lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note8. Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note8. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a little sharper display than Galaxy S10e, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy S10e captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 0.39 inches back camera sensor and a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note8, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S10e is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Note8.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.